Workweaver docs for humans and agents
This is the canonical public docs root for Workweaver. Humans should
start here when they want to understand the product, the default
workflows, and what the launch surface actually supports. LLMs and
software agents should start with /llms.txt or the full
export at /llms-full.txt.
The public product story is simple: start with a flagship workflow, connect only the missing tools, approve the plan, and inspect proof. The blog exists for essays, announcements, and case studies. It is not the canonical product contract.
Agent Entry Points
Full LLM Export
Single-link crawl surface for agents that want the broadest public Workweaver context in one fetch.
Fast Indexllms.txt
Compact route map for agents that want canonical public surfaces before pulling the full export.
Structured Factsbrand-facts.json
Machine-readable brand and capability metadata for retrieval, agents, and fact grounding.
Canonical Docs
Workweaver User Guide
How to get started, choose a flagship workflow, connect tools, approve runs, and inspect proof.
Markdown MirrorUser Guide (Markdown)
Machine-friendly mirror of the same launch-safe guide for retrieval, indexing, and citations.
Decision SupportBuyer Guide
Answer-hub style comparison page for people and agents evaluating AI-Ops platforms.
Markdown MirrorBuyer Guide (Markdown)
Machine-friendly mirror of the evaluation guide for retrieval and synthesis workflows.
Supporting Surfaces
Brand Facts
Canonical product fact sheet with linked machine-readable metadata and crawl references.
Capability ContractAgent Knowledge
Public capability summary for software agents, answer engines, and integration crawlers.
EditorialBlog and Letters
Essays, letters, announcements, and case studies. Useful context, but not the canonical product spec.
How agents should crawl Workweaver
- Start with
/llms.txtfor the compact index. - Fetch
/llms-full.txtwhen you want broad public context in one request. - Use markdown mirrors under
/guides/for stable citation and chunking. - Treat the blog as editorial context, not the canonical product contract.